We recently mentioned the amazing growth of union staff salaries. Labor insiders are beginning to hop on the same bandwagon, highlighting the top echelon of the pay scale for scrutiny.
When Labor Notes took a look at data filed under the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA), they found that between the years of 2000 and 2008, the number of union staff earning more than $100,000 and those earning more than $150,000 a year both tripled!
Labor Notes bemoaned the payment of excessive salaries at the expense of funding organizing efforts at a time when union densities have been plummeting. According to their calculations, placing a salary cap of $150,000 on total compensation (many officers double their salaries or better with reimbursable expenses, car allowances, etc.) would provide $143
Continue reading Union Fat Cats
A healthcare bill has passed. That is probably the most significant statement to make about the Employee Free Choice Act and labor law change this week. Although Big Labor had a dog in the healthcare fight, the energy consumed diminished progress on Labor’s more pressing objectives. “The attempt to get a health care bill sort of sucked all the oxygen out of the room,” asserts David Zonderman, a labor history professor at North Carolina State University. “I don’t think anyone would disagree — whether you’re in favor of or against [health care reform] — that it has taken up a phenomenal amount of legislative time.”
Now that the healthcare bridge has been crossed, Big Labor is hopeful and business interests are nervous about what may happen next on the
Continue reading EFCA Update
FireDog Lake is reporting that, according to Senator Tom Harkin, Craig Becker will receive a recess appointment during the Easter Congressional recess. Not a complete shock, especially given the outcome of the healthcare debate. I imagine things will start hopping over at the NLRB once Chairman Liebman has Mr. Becker on her squad. Can you say “rulemaking?”
With a 93-0 vote the Senate passed the FAA Reauthorization Act minus the controversial labor amendment that the Teamsters needed to organize FedEx. Now the bill goes back to the House for reconciliation. The Competitive Enterprise Institute published a brief that was written by LRI’s Russ Brown and served as a strong reference for lawmakers.
Here’s another great example of why relying on a union authorization card or membership card as a showing of interest is a terrible idea. An employee of a unionized grocer did not want to join the union. The helpful officials of the UFCW told him to just sign the membership card and write “Beck Decision” at the top so that he wouldn’t have to pay dues. They then promptly asked his employers to withhold dues from his paycheck. When he asked to have his Beck rights observed they then asked his company to fire him. Every employee considering unionization should read this story.
General Motors opened a new lithium battery plant in Michigan in January. To the surprise of most, the company hired no laid-off UAW members for its work force, but instead hired non-union labor. Quipped blogger Ed Niedermeyer, “If GM can get away with using non-union workers at a crucial plant that’s supposed to represent the firm’s future, things aren’t looking so good for our friends in organized labor.”
Additionally, GM joined with Chrysler and Toyota to outsource Teamster car haulers’ work to non-union trucking firms, replacing the Teamster drivers at Ryder Truck with a non-union company. It will be interesting to see how the weakened UAW will respond.
Trumka and the AFL-CIO propose a novel way to create jobs: tax Wall Street financial transactions and use the revenue to fund “infrastructure” jobs, such as road-paving. These jobs tend to be unionized. In addition, the AFL-CIO plan suggests jobs meet “minimum labor standards,” another way to say “likely to be union” jobs.
Although some financial mavens have agreed that implementing certain transaction taxes may mitigate rampant speculation in the markets, neither the government nor the U.S. Chamber of Commerce agree that taxes are the answer to speculation issues or to job creation.
The AFL-CIO intends to unleash a grass-roots campaign for the jobs program, called “Jobs Now Make Wall Street Pay,” in mid-March. Trumka is hoping to capitalize on voter anger over the government bank bailout scheme.
Although Trumka says his plan would raise $100 billion dollars per year in revenue, Martin Regalia, chief economist for
Continue reading Soak The Rich To Create More Union Jobs
Labor Relations INK
In This Issue:
• Labor Relations Insight by Phil Wilson • EFCA Update • Health Industry In For Rough Ride • Soak The Rich To Create More Union Jobs • SEIU Watch, and more…
Labor Relations Insight from Phil Wilson
Yesterday I got an interesting email from the Department of Labor. The DOL is soliciting ideas for “Open Government.”
“Open government” ranks right up there with “jumbo shrimp” or “civil war” in the oxymoron department. I’d love to see an estimate of the carbon footprint of the Freedom of Information Act. I
Continue reading INK: March 12, 2010
Mr. Teflon, Andy Stern of the SEIU, has thus far evaded any further inquiry into his alleged violation of lobbying regulations, and received an Obama appointment to a special “debt panel.” Since Congress doesn’t have the moral resolve to take action into the runaway federal deficit, Obama created an 18-member panel tasked to recommend ways to balance the federal budget by 2015. After observing the last several years of SEIU tactics, it seems Stern may be quite the dubious choice.
Stern’s leadership of SEIU received a solar plexus punch when Local 1021 swept his appointed leaders aside in a recent election, capturing all of the major offices and winning almost total control of the Executive Board. The outcome was salt in the recent wounds created by SEIU losses at Santa Rosa Memorial
Continue reading SEIU Watch
Not only are unions losing members, they are losing respect among Americans. In the latest nationwide survey by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, only 41% say they have a favorable opinion of labor unions. In January 2007, a clear majority (58%) had a favorable view of unions.
Even among union households, almost a quarter of those responding held an unfavorable view of unions.