In this issue:

  • The Storm Before The Storm
  • Coronavirus and Business
  • Coronavirus and Unions
  • Scoreboard, Union Corruption and more…

The bottom of each story contains a link to the individual post on our site.

**********

Labor Relations Insight by Phil Wilson

The Storm Before the Storm

Have you picked up any new routines during the COVID-19 lockdown? I have. I’m (slightly) more active, walking a lot more and doing a workout challenge. I knocked a few books off my reading list. Been doing a little work on my chess. And I’m eating at home with my family (and sleeping in my own bed!) every night.

As a company we’ve also picked up some new routines. We meet more regularly and communicate better than ever. We are better connected with our clients, consulting partners, and the broader labor and employee relations community. While I do get tired of Zoom meetings, I believe that the challenges of the last couple of months have forced us to innovate and execute in a way we never have before. We are already a better company, and we’ll only get better.

The latest book I’m reading is called Pale Rider, about the Spanish flu pandemic of 1918. You may wonder if I’ve lost my marbles with that pick (like there’s not enough pandemic analysis out there?). I’m reading it now because in a very real way we are reliving that experience. And I hope to understand how the world changes on the back side of this pandemic.

It is eerie the number of similarities in the way we are handling the current pandemic and what happened in 1918. All of the arguments we’re having now about reopening the country, especially things like churches, sporting events, and theaters, they struggled with in 1918. Certain parts of the country recovered at different rates than others. The country (and the world) faced three waves of pandemic and the pandemic changed a lot of our institutions forever.

Last month I focused on examples of how unions are taking advantage of the COVID-19 crisis. This month I think it’s important to think about how the labor relations world will change as we come out of this crisis. Unions clearly believe – and there is a lot of evidence to support this belief – that the aftermath of this crisis will create the greatest organizing opportunity in nearly a century. Perhaps the greatest opportunity ever.

The best article I’ve read on this subject is by veteran labor relations reporter Steve Levine. Levine’s argument is that the pandemic isn’t a limited moment in time where organized labor has the upper hand for a year or two. Instead, this crisis will shake the economy and our institutions to their core. Income inequality was already a major issue in the country before the pandemic – this crisis highlights that gap like never before. Many companies won’t survive. Massive numbers of people will be unemployed. Working people have more sympathy than at any time since the Great Depression. People’s expectations about the proper role of government are changing.

The seismic shifts of this crisis will impact every corner of the economy. The global economy has come to a screeching halt, leading to financial pain not seen since the Great Depression (and very likely worse than that). And this is just the beginning.

In 1918 the initial wave of the pandemic appeared to be a bad flu season. But it’s very unclear how today’s pandemic compares to the one in 1918. Is this just a really bad flu season that we overreacted to? Or is it wave one of a multi-year pandemic, like the one in 1918? It was the second wave of infections that killed somewhere between 2 and 5% of the global population (nobody really knows). There are many reasons that second wave was so deadly (especially the end of World War I), and the optimist in me senses that the fall wave of this pandemic won’t be anything like 1918. Either way, the economic fallout will be with us for years.

Worker activism – often without the help of unions – was on the rise well before this crisis. During this crisis unions are taking advantage of these situations in a way that they never have before. They are looking for opportunities to provide resources and support to protesting workers. They are connecting workers to local resources in anticipation of future organizing. They are gearing up for nationwide strike actions as well – May 1st will be the first of what I expect will be many attempts at a general strike.

Unions are also using this opportunity to make inroads with groups that have been very difficult for them to organize as our economy shifted to a primarily service-oriented one. They are going after tech workers, gig workers, along with many of the groups they traditionally represent. In addition, they are connecting political activism (especially the progressive wing of the Democratic party) to union organizing with an intensity that I’ve never seen before.

What does this mean for companies? I think Levine’s article lays out a few of the high points. The actions companies take during the pandemic will be watched carefully. The efforts they make to take care of (or not take care of) their teams will be watched. Does management authentically show concern for the safety of the team, even when they cannot guarantee it? What actions are they taking to protect their essential workers from infection? When sacrifices are required, are they shared between executives, shareholders, and the front-line? How much do they consider the plight of their teams as they face a lot of Hobson’s choices about their businesses? And how well do they communicate about what’s happening?

Unions cannot “solve” any of these issues. There is a global supply problem with PPE, food, and other essential goods. Unions can’t fix these supply problems and often make them worse. Union members were no better prepared for this crisis than any others. But that’s not really the point. Organizers are masters at taking any situation and using it as a proof point for why unions are needed or how they got something that proves their value.

Over the last few decades these organizing tactics were pretty easy to defeat. The vast majority of employers treated employees well and when organizers painted management as evil it didn’t really fit with the experience of most workers. Only the worst situations seemed like a union might provide an answer. Today is different. Whether unions can actually deliver anything is almost beside the point. Today people are desperate for hope and don’t see a lot of good options. Even a bad option seems like a good option. And in that environment the typical organizing tactics will work. Unions haven’t gotten any better – they’ve just arrived at their moment.

Link & Comments

**********

Union Bailout Update

The NLRB finalized amendments to new election rules, to include a new blocking charge policy, an update to voluntary recognition rules, and a “proof” requirement for Section 9(a) recognition in the construction industry. The union filing of an unfair labor practice blocking charge will no longer prevent an election from proceeding. The board will impound the ballots while the charge is either withdrawn, dismissed or resolved. For voluntary recognition, the board adopted the Dana Corp decision, granting a 45-day open period to file an election petition upon notice of voluntary recognition. In Section 9(a) recognition, it will now be required of the union to provide positive evidence of majority employee support to prove a Section 9(a) relationship. See additional details of these three amendments at this link.

The Board also made it less perilous for an employer to withdraw recognition from a union if employees present proof of lack of majority support for the union. Until now, the union could secretly re-organize the employees after the employer announced it planned to withdraw recognition, putting the company at legal risk. However, in Johnson Controls, Inc., the union cannot secretly reorganize employees but must file a petition for union election within 45 days of the employer announcing intent to withdraw recognition.

In response to the CoVid-19 pandemic, on March 27, NLRB General Counsel, Peter Robb, issued a memorandum providing guidance on employers’ obligation to bargain during emergency situations. The memo provided no new information but rather pointed to nine previous NLRB decisions “in which the Board considered the duty to bargain during emergencies.” Download a copy of the memo here.

The Board has pitched the decision of how and when to lift the suspension of union elections to the Regional Directors, after it temporarily suspended all elections until April 6th. We’ve been compiling notes from consultants and attorneys on what is happening region by region, and holding a weekly webinar to provide an update.  If you are interested in participating, send an email from a company email address to gkittinger@lrims.com.

The financial aid loan package for mid-sized businesses comes with a catch: to take advantage of the program, you have to submit to a neutrality agreement. Companies with between 500 and 10,000 employees applying for a direct loan from the Treasury Department would be required to “make a good-faith certification that the recipient will remain neutral in any union organizing effort for the term of the loan.”

California employers with unlimited vacation policies should review this Court of Appeals decision carefully. The court ruled, using the “law and equity” standard, that three employees terminated by a company were entitled to wages for “unused” vacation days, even though their vacation days did not accrue and the written vacation policy that applied to some employees of the company didn’t apply to them.

Link & Comments

**********

Labor Solutions Corner

LRI is currently involved in several organizing campaigns amidst the pandemic. In some cases, we’ve been asked to be physically present, while maintaining social distancing protocols. However, in several instances we have had to use virtual means of communicating with management and employees.

If you find yourself with a suspended campaign, the worst thing you can do is stop communicating, whether your employees are working remotely or are still physically at the workplace.

If you need help figuring out how to continue to effectively communicate, using virtual conferencing, text messaging, websites and videos or a combination of these mediums, we can help.

Give us a call.  800-888-09115

**********

Coronavirus And Business

A new law creates a federal paid sick leave policy designed to provide help to employees affected by the pandemic. Qualified employees include those who:

  • have COVID-19;
  • are in quarantine;
  • are caring for a family member affected by the virus — that is, a relative who has COVID-19;
  • are subject to a government quarantine;
  • have been advised by a doctor to self-quarantine or;
  • who are caring for children whose schools or day care centers have closed.

The law reimburses businesses via tax credits, provides workers with up to two weeks of paid leave, and caps payments at $511 a day for those who are sick with the virus or seeking care, and $200 a day for those caring for a sick family member or children.

State governments have issued a wide variety of Shelter-in-Place orders, and there can be severe civil and criminal penalties for violating such orders. This leaves “non-essential” businesses in a quandary: do they protect their business’ viability and employees’ economic welfare, or do they submit to the orders to prevent the spread of the virus?  This chart indicates the orders by state.

Link & Comments

**********

Coronavirus And Unions

In the spirit of “never let a crisis go to waste,” Big Labor is taking every advantage it can to turn the pandemic to its own ends.

The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), union of government employees, sued the government for hazard pay related to the pandemic, attempting to secure 25% hazard pay and an 8% “environmental differential.”

Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 in Seattle also demanded hazard pay until such time as Governor Jay Inslee lifts the stay-at-home order.

When the Brooklyn Zoo laid off about 60 workers, the Teamsters filed an unfair labor charge, claiming violation of contract. The Zoo attested that they consulted labor attorneys to ensure their actions complied with the collective bargaining agreement.

UNITE HERE Local 11, which represents around 30,000 hotel employees in Southern California and Arizona, sent text messages to laid off workers demanding they continue to make dues payments, and threatening them with loss of health benefits if they don’t.

The United Food & Commercial Workers (UFCW) in Alaska sent a letter to the governor asking to have grocery workers classified as “first responders,” to enable them priority for receiving personal protection equipment and testing. In a similar move, the UFCW International teamed up with a national grocery retailer to ask the same nationwide.

Workers at a host of fast food and grocery stores are striking across the country, with and without union support. It is likely that Big Labor will co-opt this momentum wherever possible. In California, a measure was passed to provide supplemental paid sick leave to employees in the food industry who test positive for CoVid-19.

Image Credit: Youtube: Jason Koebler

For companies that have union contracts, they are likely to encounter stiff resistance at the negotiating table if they need to look for concessions in the wake of the potential financial devastation brought on by the pandemic. Whether discussing furloughs amidst the crisis or recovery efforts post-crisis, it is likely unionized companies will encounter a wave of difficult bargaining sessions in the coming months.

Link & Comments

**********

SCORE BOARD

Who are the winners (and losers) of the labor movement? Don’t guess, just check the LRI Scoreboard

View this month’s scoreboard (archives also located here).

Download a PDF of this month’s scoreboard

**********

Union Corruption

Wilma Liebman

After years of corruption coming to light at the United Auto Workers (UAW), the union has made a move to save face by hiring Wilma Liebman to serve as the organization’s first-ever external Ethics Officer. Liebman served on the NLRB under former Presidents Bush and Clinton and moved to Chairman of the NLRB under President Obama.

This announcement came just days after a regional director for the UAW was suspended following charges of workplace harassment.

Meanwhile, over at a United Steelworkers local, a former financial secretary pleaded guilty to lying on the union’s financial reporting form (LM-2).

LM-2’s are meant to promote labor union and labor management transparency so membership can see how their dues money is being spent.

Link & Comments

**********

It’s All Academic

After an invitation to interested parties to file briefs on whether or not the board should assert jurisdiction over charter schools “as a class” back in February, the NLRB ruled on March 25th that a New York charter school fell under Board jurisdiction.

This means that the Board will continue to assert jurisdiction over charter schools on a case-by-case basis – an unfortunate decision for unions as it holds charter school to federal labor laws, which require a secret ballot election as opposed to the “card check” that many state public education laws allow.

Link & Comments

**********

Right to Work

The NLRB has issued a charge against the National Association of Broadcast Employees and Technicians (NABET-CWA) Local 51 for denying an employee of his Beck rights and instead demanding approximately $10,000 in union fees.

Beck mandates that “private sector workers who choose to refrain from formal union membership can only be forced to pay the portion of dues directly germane to the union’s bargaining functions.”

The union refused the employee’s request to adjust the dues accordingly and threatened that he would not be “eligible for future employment” if he didn’t pay up.

Link & Comments

**********

Labor Relations INK is published semi-weekly and is edited by Labor Relations Institute, Inc. Feel free to pass this newsletter on to anyone you think might enjoy it.

New subscribers can sign up by visiting: https://lrionline.com/free-stuff/newsletter-signup/

If you use content from this newsletter please attribute it to Labor Relations Institute and include our website address: http://www.LRIonline.com

Contributing editors for this issue: Phillip Wilson, Greg Kittinger, and Meghan Jones

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to receive our labor relations newsletters and updates. You can manage your email preferences by clicking the link at the bottom of any of our email communications.

NOTE: If you are using older versions of Internet Explorer, read the text version, as the html may not load properly. We recommend upgrading to the latest version.