<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NLRB: Employee Free Choice Act Ace in the Hole?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lrionline.com/nlrb-employee-free-choice-act/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lrionline.com/nlrb-employee-free-choice-act</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:28:19 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Union Avoidance &#124; Employee Free Choice Act &#124; Positive Workplace &#124; Labor Relations Institute &#171;</title>
		<link>http://lrionline.com/nlrb-employee-free-choice-act/comment-page-1#comment-2247</link>
		<dc:creator>Union Avoidance &#124; Employee Free Choice Act &#124; Positive Workplace &#124; Labor Relations Institute &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 21:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lrionline.com/?p=2064#comment-2247</guid>
		<description>[...] to change the rules governing forming a union through administrative action…” We&#8217;ve been saying the same thing for quite some time, but now the top levels of the AFL-CIO confirm that&#8217;s the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to change the rules governing forming a union through administrative action…” We&#8217;ve been saying the same thing for quite some time, but now the top levels of the AFL-CIO confirm that&#8217;s the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Employee Free Choice Act &#124; INK: August 13, 2009 &#171;</title>
		<link>http://lrionline.com/nlrb-employee-free-choice-act/comment-page-1#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Employee Free Choice Act &#124; INK: August 13, 2009 &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lrionline.com/?p=2064#comment-127</guid>
		<description>[...] Here&#8217;s what happened.  Read the rest of the article  here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here&#8217;s what happened.  Read the rest of the article  here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Employee Free Choice Act &#124; INK: July 23, 2009 &#171;</title>
		<link>http://lrionline.com/nlrb-employee-free-choice-act/comment-page-1#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Employee Free Choice Act &#124; INK: July 23, 2009 &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lrionline.com/?p=2064#comment-107</guid>
		<description>[...] of an EFCA-type bill will endanger Right-To-Work laws in all states that have them, and our earlier conclusion has been reinforced, that almost all of the provisions of the EFCA could be enacted by NLRB [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of an EFCA-type bill will endanger Right-To-Work laws in all states that have them, and our earlier conclusion has been reinforced, that almost all of the provisions of the EFCA could be enacted by NLRB [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
