<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) News Room &#187; stern</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lrionline.com/media/tag/stern/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lrionline.com/media</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:00:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>INK: April 23, 2009</title>
		<link>http://lrionline.com/media/2009/04/23/april-23-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://lrionline.com/media/2009/04/23/april-23-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Labor Relations Ink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cna-nnoc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Free Choice Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scoreboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sticky fingers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ufcw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unite-here]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lrionline.com/?p=1691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Labor Relations INK
Download a PDF of this issue with links here.
 
EFCA Update
Do not fall asleep behind the wheel, lulled either by a false sense of security, or by  numbness stemming from the confusing messages related to the prognosis for the Employee Free Choice Act.  It does seem that the cards are stacking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: xx-large;"><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1508" title="inkquill22" src="http://www.lrionline.com/media/wp-content/uploads/inkquill22.jpg" alt="inkquill22" width="73" height="79" /> Labor Relations</span> <span style="color: #ff9900;"><span style="font-family: arial black,avant garde;">INK</span></span></span></p>
<p><a href="http://lrionline.com/ink/images/042309/ink_042309.pdf">Download a PDF of this issue with links here.</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>EFCA Update</strong></p>
<p>Do not fall asleep behind the wheel, lulled either by a false sense of security, or by  numbness stemming from the confusing messages related to the prognosis for the Employee Free Choice Act.  It does seem that the cards are stacking up against the bill passing “as is.”  Senator Jim Webb (D-VA) has indicated he may <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/39637/another-dagger-to-card-check  " target="_blank">pull  his support</a>, another <a href="http://news.prnewswire.com/DisplayReleaseContent.aspx?ACCT=104&amp;STORY=/www/story/04-21-2009/0005009960&amp;EDATE= " target="_blank">business group</a> has added to the fray on the side of EFCA opponents,  and a Teamster-endorsed recent senatorial candidate got away with <a href="http://primebuzz.kcstar.com/?q=node/18109 " target="_blank">dodging confession of support</a> for the bill.  However, bubbles of compromise discussion have continued to surface, and even those who have said “no” to the bill, have typically qualified their “no” by specifying they are opposed to the current <em>version</em> of the bill.</p>
<p>Big Labor mogul <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2009/04/20/stern_considers_alternatives_t.html?wprss=44" target="_blank">Andy Stern</a> attempted to bolster his union comrades.  &#8220;We are on the hunt for a solution,&#8221; he said, and indicated that it would be a mistake for Big Labor to wait for the next election cycle, hoping to pick up more votes for the current form of the bill.  The AFL-CIO posted a <a href="http://blog.aflcio.org/2009/04/21/grassroots-actions-build-momentum-for-employee-free-choice-act/#more-12125  " target="_blank">list of grassroots efforts</a> working on behalf of “reform,” and in a move straight out of the standard union playbook, the SEIU appears to have <a href="http://refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com/2009/01/21/unbelievable-obama-friends-have-stolen-my-email-say-i-support-them/ " target="_blank">“stolen” signatures</a> used in a non-EFCA related petition and applied them to a petition in support of the law!</p>
<p>While <a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/both-business-labor-claim-recess-victories-2009-04-18.html " target="_blank">both sides are claiming tactical victories</a> for their camp, it doesn’t appear that the EFCA proponents are close yet to pulling a passable bill out of the hat.  That’s good news for American businesses, IF they take advantage of the lull before the storm.  Big Labor will not rest – there will be labor law change, whether it comes via one “big” bill like EFCA, a compromise bill, or a group of smaller actions.  It will become more difficult for businesses to overcome organizing attempts in the near future, and more businesses will be susceptible to organizing than ever before.  They must <a href="http://lrionline.com/employee-free-choice-act/" target="_blank">prepare now</a>, or they <em>will</em> pay the price for their procrastination in the very near future.</p>
<p>**********</p>
<p><strong>“An’ You Don’t Mess Around With … Andy?”</strong></p>
<p><img src="http://lrionline.com/ink/images/042309/stern.jpg" alt="" hspace="3" width="130" height="87" align="left" />Andy Stern, volatile head of the Service Employees  International Union (SEIU), is a scrapper par excellence.   Having buried the hatchet and come to an agreement with the CNA-NNOC to split the proceeds of hospital organizing (nurses to CNA, service staff to SEIU), he is now <a href="http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2009/apr/16/has-labor-visionary-crossed-line/  " target="_blank">taking advantage of the rift in UNITE-HERE</a> by wooing away the UNITE side of the war-torn organization to join the SEIU.  The move was a bold encroachment into the gaming turf Stern has set his sights on.</p>
<p>John Wilhelm, co-president of UNITE HERE, calls Stern’s efforts “a naked power grab,” accusing him of attempting a “hostile takeover of another union’s jurisdiction in a way that is unprecedented in the modern labor movement.”</p>
<p>Labor experts disagree with Stern’s “growth at any cost” strategy, which makes concessions on benefits and working conditions in exchange for making it easier to organize in specific locations.</p>
<p>**********</p>
<p><strong>Jaws Revisited</strong></p>
<p align="left"><img src="http://lrionline.com/ink/images/042309/jaws.jpg" alt="" hspace="3" width="150" height="115" align="left" />SEIU is calling for Kenneth Lewis’ head on a platter.  Why would a union be after the CEO and Chairman of Bank of America?  Simply put, they are trying to capitalize on the controversy and consumer angst that the $45 billion in government funding has created, to <a href="http://charlotte.bizjournals.com/charlotte/stories/2009/04/20/story1.html?b=1240200000^1812759 " target="_blank">push their agenda</a> for labor law change, specifically the Employee Free Choice Act.</p>
<p>“They’re after blood. They’re chumming the waters for sharks,” UNC Charlotte finance professor Tony Plath says of the union’s campaign. “I’m not a cheerleader for BofA. But let’s be objective about this: These attacks are all about card check.”  Plath reasons that by accusing a major company of abusing consumers and workers, Big Labor stands to gain support in Congress for changes they are trying to push through.  There are no unionized banks, but with the proposed changes in labor law, that could all change rapidly.</p>
<p>**********</p>
<p><strong>Only In A Union</strong></p>
<p>While Big Labor is attempting to force American workers to give up the protection of a secret ballot in exchange for the easily manipulated “card check” process, the Teamsters are showing the disrespect they hold for any democratic process.  Three<br />
Teamster members are on trial for <a href="http://www.chitowndailynews.org/Chicago_news/Lack_of_secrecy_duplicate_ballots_become_focus_of_Teamster_trial,25021" target="_blank">rigging an election</a> in 2004, apparently in <a href="http://chicagoist.com/2009/04/15/recap_teamsters_trial.php " target="_blank">collusion with the attorney</a> of their local.</p>
<p align="left">Now that’s democracy, Big Labor style!</p>
<p>**********</p>
<p><strong>LRI Website Update</strong></p>
<p align="left"><a href="http://www.lrionline.com/ink/images/042309/new-website.pdf"><img src="http://lrionline.com/ink/images/042309/new-website.jpg" alt="" hspace="2" width="164" height="149" align="top" /></a></p>
<p align="left">We’ve made it easier for you to find what you need on our web site.  Hard-hitting videos, on-target publications, a growing inventory of free resources, and our exclusive library of databases, everything you need to move your company ahead of the competition.   Here is a <a href="http://www.lrionline.com/ink/images/042309/new-website.pdf  " target="_blank">quick diagram</a> highlighting some of the changes.  <a href="http://www.lrionline.com " target="_blank">Check it out</a> – spend a few minutes on the site, and we’d love to hear your feedback!</p>
<p>**********</p>
<p><strong>UFCW vs. Wal-Mart</strong></p>
<p>The UFCW is wielding a new <a href="http://www.lrionline.com/ink/images/042309/ufcw_flyer.pdf  " target="_blank">Union Authorization Card</a> sporting a picture and quote from President Obama.  In the last month or so, about 60 organizers have been <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123992564986427357.html  " target="_blank">sent to over 100 Wal-Mart stores</a> across 15 states, using the new card to secure signatures.</p>
<p align="left">As the nations largest private-sector employer with 1.4 million employees in 3600 stores, the unions see Wal-Mart as the key to the nations retailers, whose jobs cannot be shipped overseas.  If the Wal-Mart domino falls, Big Labor knows the chain reaction will be enormous.</p>
<p>**********</p>
<p><strong>Kidnapped!?</strong></p>
<p>If the new trend to import all things French (socialism…) continues, we might soon see union locals <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/15/french-unions-try-a-new-negotiating-tactic-kidnapping/  " target="_blank">kidnapping company</a> officials.  Disgruntled employees of French auto parts manufacturer Faurecia recently “sequestered” executives for over 5 hours to protest a restructuring and plant shutdowns.  Sony, 3M and Caterpiller have also had to deal with this unusual method of “negotiation.”  Almost half of the French population believes it is a valid means of bargaining.</p>
<p>**********</p>
<p><strong>APRIL SCORE BOARD</strong></p>
<p>Who are the winners (and losers) of the labor movement? Don&#8217;t guess, just<br />
check the LRI Scoreboard</p>
<p class="none" align="left"><a href="http://www.lrionline.com/ink/scoreboard.htm" target="_blank"><img longdesc="http://lrionline.com/ink/ink/scoreboards/INK_Scoreboard_Apl_09.jpg" src="http://lrionline.com/ink/scoreboards/INK_Scoreboard_Apl_09.jpg" alt="" width="138" height="172" align="left" />View this month&#8217;s scoreboard (archives also located here).</a></p>
<p class="none" align="left"><a href="http://www.lrionline.com/ink/scoreboards/INK_Scoreboard_Apl_09.pdf" target="_blank">Download a PDF of this month&#8217;s scoreboard.</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>**********</p>
<p><strong>Higher Ed &amp; Big Three Auto</strong></p>
<p>The UAW represents academic student employees at California State University.  The latest round of contract talks have been stymied over the issue of fee waivers.  Full fee waivers would cost the school between $8 to $11 million annually, and CSU is not prepared to budge on the issue.</p>
<p>“<a href="http://www.daily49er.com/news/uaw-says-strike-may-be-something-it-has-to-do-1.1646849  " target="_blank">A strike</a> might be something that we’ll have to do,” a UAW spokesperson said.</p>
<p>**********</p>
<p><strong>Sticky Fingers!</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nlpc.org/union-corruption-update" target="_blank">Current charges or sentences</a> of embezzling union officials:</p>
<p>In a side note to our union fraud section, Obama <a href="http://www.deseretnews.com/article/1,5143,705299110,00.html  " target="_blank">recently rescinded</a> new financial disclosure rules put in place in the last days of the Bush administration aimed at making it easier to spot union corruption.  Sen. Orrin Hatch, a former chairman of the Senate Labor Committee, complained,  &#8220;In a time when the president himself said we need more accountability and transparency in government, canceling rules to help root out corruption is not the way to go.&#8221;</p>
<p>Lyndon Denney	- USW:	$24,000</p>
<p>Larry Ramsey &#8211; ROU:	$163,222</p>
<p>Frankie Sanders &#8211; APWU:	$13,000</p>
<p>Norman Stefanik	- USW:	$25,808</p>
<p>Rosa Della Porta	- ILWU:	$108,000</p>
<p>William Sargent, Jr.-	AFGE:	$31,000</p>
<p>**********</p>
<p><strong>Labor Relations INK</strong> is published semi-weekly and<br />
is edited by Labor Relations Institute, Inc. Feel<br />
free to pass this newsletter on to anyone you<br />
think might enjoy it. New subscribers can sign up<br />
by visiting:</p>
<p><a href="http://lrionline.com/free-stuff/newsletter-signup" target="_blank">http://lrionline.com/free-stuff/newsletter-signup</a></p>
<p>If you use content from this newsletter please<br />
attribute it to Labor Relations Institute and<br />
include our website address: <a href="http://www.LRIonline.com" target="_blank">www.LRIonline.com</a></p>
<p>Contributing editors for this issue: Phillip Wilson, Greg Kittinger</p>
<p>Labor Relations Institute<br />
7850 South Elm Place &#8211; Suite E<br />
Broken Arrow, OK<br />
74011<br />
US</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lrionline.com/media/2009/04/23/april-23-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>INK: February 12, 2009</title>
		<link>http://lrionline.com/media/2009/02/12/february-12-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://lrionline.com/media/2009/02/12/february-12-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Labor Relations Ink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuhw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seiu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sticky fingers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teamsters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ufcw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ulp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unite-here]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lrionline.com/?p=1679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Labor Relations INK
Download a PDF of this issue with links here.
 
SEIU / UHW-West Conflict Erupts
SEIU’s Andy Stern final pulled the trigger and put the large (150,000 member) California-based local into trusteeship.  United Healthcare Workers-West president Sal Rosselli, and 17 other elected officers, were ousted, and SEIU and moved to seize control of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: xx-large;"><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1508" title="inkquill22" src="http://www.lrionline.com/media/wp-content/uploads/inkquill22.jpg" alt="inkquill22" width="73" height="79" /> Labor Relations</span> <span style="color: #ff9900;"><span style="font-family: arial black,avant garde;">INK</span></span></span></p>
<p><a href="http://lrionline.com/ink/images/021209/ink_021209.pdf">Download a PDF of this issue with links here.</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>SEIU / UHW-West Conflict Erupts</strong></p>
<p align="left"><img src="http://lrionline.com/ink/images/021209/nuhw.jpg" alt="" hspace="3" width="200" height="150" align="left" />SEIU’s Andy Stern final <a href="http://labornotes.org/node/2043 " target="_blank">pulled the trigger</a> and put the large (150,000 member) California-based local into trusteeship.  United Healthcare Workers-West president Sal Rosselli, and 17 other elected officers, <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-union2-2009feb02,0,6911054.story  " target="_blank">were ousted</a>, and SEIU and moved to seize control of the local’s offices.</p>
<p align="left">In what some observers called “trench warfare,” the UHW-West leadership first refused to vacate their offices, and then opened a <a href="http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2009/02/08/18568977.php  " target="_blank">new union</a>, the National Union of Healthcare Workers, to rival SEIU for the membership of the local, petitioning for elections in 62 hospitals and healthcare facilities.</p>
<p align="left">The west-coast dispute was <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/sunday/commentary/la-oe-meyerson1-2009feb01,0,3925406.story  " target="_blank">mirrored in the east</a>, as the UNITE side of the UNITE-HERE union took the HERE side of the executive committee to court over violations of its constitution.</p>
<p>**********</p>
<p><strong>OLMS Teeth To Be Pulled?</strong></p>
<p>Since the start of fiscal year 2001, the Labor Department&#8217;s Office of Labor-Management Standards cumulative <a href="http://news.prnewswire.com/ViewContent.aspx?ACCT=109&amp;STORY=/www/story/01-09-2009/0004952133&amp;EDATE " target="_blank">enforcement results</a> include 1,004 indictments, 929 convictions, and payments or orders of restitution of $93,110,576.  However, the mission of the OLMS to protect union members from financial abuses and other crimes by those who serve in positions of trust may be jeopardized, as Labor Secretary designate Solis will not commit to funding, and in fact parried the direct question into a comment antagonistic to business, rather than the unions officials OLMS is designed to monitor.</p>
<p><code><img src="http://lrionline.com/media/wp-content/uploads/solis.jpg" /></code></p>
<p>Watch the video on YouTube at this link:  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m55fyIT5q84" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m55fyIT5q84</a></p>
<p>**********</p>
<p><strong>Obama Begins Union “Dues” Payments</strong></p>
<p align="left">Whether or not the Employee Free Choice Act moves through Congress swiftly, Big Labor will have plenty to thank Obama for.  He has already begun the process of tossing bones to his biggest backers.  Several Executive Orders were signed giving unions preferential treatment in <a href="http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2009/01/022692.php  " target="_blank">Federal contracts</a> and making it harder for workers to <a href="http://www.lvrj.com/opinion/38770392.html  " target="_blank">understand their rights</a>.   Additionally, power is granted to the Secretary of Labor to <a href="http://www.nrtw.org/en/press/2009/01/obama-makes  " target="_blank">blacklist</a> union targets from federal contracts.</p>
<p align="left">Meanwhile, Big Labor is keeping the heat on the newly elected Congress, and President.  Andy Stern of the Service Employees International Union threatened to “<a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/01/31/labor.stern/?imw=Y&amp;iref=mpstoryemail " target="_blank">hold people accountable</a>” for their campaign promises.   Keep you eyes open – Big Labor’s $450 Million election debt won’t be satisfied with just a few bones.  They’ll want substantial meat, whether packaged in the EFCA or not.</p>
<p>**********</p>
<p><strong>UFCW Thugs Intimidate Worker</strong></p>
<p><img src="http://lrionline.com/ink/images/021209/riteaid.jpg" alt="" hspace="3" width="134" height="90" align="left" />At a Rite-Aid store in Niagara Falls, NY, an employee working in the stock room was approached and pressured by three representatives from the United Food and Commercial Workers Union.  The worker had filed a petition on behalf of his co-workers to have the union removed.  According to the <a href="http://www.niagara-gazette.com/local/local_story_007193207.html " target="_blank">police report</a> filed, the union representations tried to coerce him into an after-hours meeting, and he feared they were trying to harm him.</p>
<p>**********</p>
<p><strong>Employment Law Change</strong>s</p>
<p align="left">Beyond the impact of the new administration on laws related to union issues, there are more changes coming that employers will have to keep abreast of.  The workload of HR personnel will increase dramatically, and pity the small business owner who doesn’t have an HR manager!  The <strong>Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act</strong> and the <strong>Paycheck Fairness Act</strong> are <a href="http://texashrlaw.com/?p=191 " target="_blank">the first two</a> among the plethora to come.</p>
<p align="left">**********</p>
<p><strong>Pro-Business Advocacy</strong></p>
<p align="left">Americans For Job Security is a pro-business, pro-markets issue advocacy group that has joined the fight against the Employee Free Choice Act.  Among their key issues are:</p>
<p align="left">- tax reduction</p>
<p align="left">- free markets &amp; free trade</p>
<p align="left">- energy</p>
<p align="left">- transportation</p>
<p align="left">Check out their <a href="http://savejobs.org/home.php" target="_blank">web site</a>.</p>
<p>**********</p>
<p align="left"><strong>ULP Charge of the Month</strong></p>
<div>With friends like these&#8230;</div>
<p class="style3" align="left"><a href="http://lrionline.com/ink/images/021209/ulp.pdf" target="_blank"><img src="http://lrionline.com/ink/images/021209/ulp.jpg" alt="ULP charge" width="117" height="134" /></a><a href="http://lrionline.com/ink/images/021209/ulp.pdf"></a></p>
<p>Download a PDF of this ULP <a href="http://lrionline.com/ink/images/021209/ulp.pdf" target="_blank">here.</a></p>
<p>**********</p>
<p><strong>Teamsters Latest Corporate Campaign</strong></p>
<p><span class="style3"><img src="http://lrionline.com/ink/images/021209/key.jpg" alt="" hspace="3" width="120" height="110" align="left" /></span></p>
<p>Hoffa has instructed Teamster locals across the country to sever any relationships with Cleveland-based KeyCorp bank, and <a href="http://albany.bizjournals.com/albany/stories/2009/01/26/daily50.html  " target="_blank">move their banking business elsewhere</a>.  Why?   Because Key is the primary lender for Oak Harbor Freight, an Auburn, Wash., company where more than 600 Teamster members had been on a lengthy strike.</p>
<p align="left">Teamster-owned assets to be moved could run as much as $18 Billion.  Just another example of Big Labor’s strategy to drag a third party into a labor squabble.</p>
<p>**********</p>
<p><strong>Sticky Fingers</strong>!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nlpc.org/view.asp?action=viewArticle&amp;aid=2859" target="_blank">Current charges or sentences</a> of embezzling union officials:</p>
<p>Kenneth Campbell &#8211; IUOE: $290,000</p>
<p>Carl White &#8211; IATSE:	$86,000</p>
<p>Gerald Conaway &#8211; FOP:	$5,500</p>
<p>Stephen Snyder &#8211; USW:	$78,893</p>
<p>Rick Radek &#8211; BLET:	$6,700</p>
<p>Joseph  Johnson	- IBB:	$102,519</p>
<p>Richard Klemser	- IAM:	$60,000</p>
<p>Jeffrey Baker	- IAM:	$16,050</p>
<p>Danny Tilley	- TBCTC:	$9,719</p>
<p>Linda Peterson	- APWU:	$6,505</p>
<p>**********</p>
<p><strong>Labor Relations INK</strong> is published semi-weekly and<br />
is edited by Labor Relations Institute, Inc. Feel<br />
free to pass this newsletter on to anyone you<br />
think might enjoy it. New subscribers can sign up<br />
by visiting:</p>
<p><a href="http://lrionline.com/free-stuff/newsletter-signup" target="_blank">http://lrionline.com/free-stuff/newsletter-signup</a></p>
<p>If you use content from this newsletter please<br />
attribute it to Labor Relations Institute and<br />
include our website address: <a href="http://www.LRIonline.com" target="_blank">www.LRIonline.com</a></p>
<p>Contributing editors for this issue: Phillip Wilson, Greg Kittinger</p>
<p>Labor Relations Institute<br />
7850 South Elm Place &#8211; Suite E<br />
Broken Arrow, OK<br />
74011<br />
US</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lrionline.com/media/2009/02/12/february-12-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>INK: January 6, 2009</title>
		<link>http://lrionline.com/media/2009/01/06/january-6-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://lrionline.com/media/2009/01/06/january-6-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Labor Relations Ink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Free Choice Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seiu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sticky fingers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ulp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lrionline.com/?p=1670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Labor Relations INK
Download a PDF of this issue with links here.
 
&#8220;Big Labor&#8221; Secretary Solis
It is no surprise that Obama would appoint a Labor Secretary that is strongly in support of Big Labor.  The comments of several from the Labor sphere can be read here.
A NYTimes article put it quite succinctly:
“Ms. Solis has championed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: xx-large;"><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1508" title="inkquill22" src="http://www.lrionline.com/media/wp-content/uploads/inkquill22.jpg" alt="inkquill22" width="73" height="79" /> Labor Relations</span> <span style="color: #ff9900;"><span style="font-family: arial black,avant garde;">INK</span></span></span></p>
<p><a href="http://lrionline.com/ink/images/010609/ink_010609.pdf">Download a PDF of this issue with links here.</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>&#8220;Big Labor&#8221; Secretary Solis</strong></p>
<p align="left"><img src="http://lrionline.com/ink/images/010609/Solis.jpg" alt="" hspace="3" width="91" height="111" align="left" />It is no surprise that Obama would appoint a Labor Secretary that is strongly in support of Big Labor.  The comments of several from the Labor sphere can be read <a href="http://progressillinois.com/2008/12/18/obama-solis-labor " target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>A NYTimes <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/19/us/politics/19obama.html?_r=1&amp;ref=todayspaper&amp;pagewanted=print " target="_blank">article</a> put it quite succinctly:</p>
<p align="left">“Ms. Solis has championed a bill, called the Employee Free Choice Act, that is the No. 1 priority of organized labor… She is the only member of Congress on the board of American Rights at Work, a pro-union group pushing for the bill.”</p>
<p align="left">Some insiders believe that Solis’ pro-labor stance will add weight to the contest over the EFCA.  Although it is now being called “<a href="http://republicans.edlabor.house.gov/PRArticle.aspx?NewsID=779&amp;IID=17  " target="_blank">controversial</a>” by even the mainstream media, and as prior proponents in Congress are beginning to wane in vocalizing their continued support, Solis may be the <a href="http://www.pww.org/article/articleview/14224/" target="_blank">trump card</a> pushing the bill to near the top of the legislative priorities.</p>
<p>**********</p>
<p><strong>Airlines a Reflection of Big Three Auto?</strong></p>
<p><img src="http://lrionline.com/ink/images/010609/airlines.jpg" alt="" width="90" height="60" /><img src="http://lrionline.com/ink/images/010609/auto.jpg" alt="" width="134" height="60" /></p>
<p>The oil price fluctuations and a weakened economy have taken their toll on the airlines, but the ongoing challenge of dealing with unions and union rules could be the albatross around the neck that brings this industry to it’s knees.</p>
<p>American is <a href="http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/12/19/ap5845262.html?partner=alerts" target="_blank">wrestling</a> with flight attendants, while Delta is <a href="http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/12/19/ap5844794.html?partner=alerts" target="_blank">struggling</a> to merge the recently acquired Northwest employees, many of whom were unionized, into it’s ranks, and pilots at Continental have been <a href="http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/12/31/ap5871602.html?partner=alerts" target="_blank">grappling</a> to reach a new contract since July of 2007.  Meanwhile, JetBlue is facing another <a href="http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/12/19/ap5845599.html?partner=alerts " target="_blank">organizing threat</a> as its pilots work to form an independent union.</p>
<p>**********</p>
<p><strong>How to Ride the Fence</strong></p>
<p align="left">Finally, American companies are becoming aware of the dangers of the pending Employee Free Choice Act.  That’s good!  Unfortunately, many of these companies will fail to join the public fracas over the bill so as not to jeopardize other legislative agendas.  That’s not so good!</p>
<p align="left">Many businesses are <a href="http://thehill.com/business--lobby/wary-of-card-check-bill-tech-lobbying-against-it-2008-12-16.html  " target="_blank">remaining on the sidelines</a> and while allowing the Chamber of Commerce and other advocates to fight the legislative battle.  Yet there is another way to fight back while remaining under the radar:  make your company a hardened target to union encroachment.  One possible (great) outcome is that Big Labor wins the EFCA battle, but then can’t make hay from it because US businesses have properly educated their employees about the facts of unionization.</p>
<p align="left">If you’re willing to at least fight on this front, <a href="http://efcaexposed.com " target="_blank">start here</a>.</p>
<p>**********</p>
<p><strong>HR Under Obama</strong></p>
<p>About 1200 HR managers responded to a <a href="http://www.hrmorning.com/what-hr-managers-told-us-about-obamas-policies/ " target="_blank">recent poll</a>:</p>
<p>Do you think President-elect Obama’s policies on employment law will:</p>
<p align="left">Make your job more difficult — 69%</p>
<p align="left">Have no effect on you — 22%</p>
<p align="left">Make your job easier — 9%</p>
<p align="left">The article lists 10 pieces of pending legislation that will affect most  businesses – and HR personnel – including the Employee Free Choice Act.</p>
<p>**********</p>
<p><strong>McDonalds Ignites Union Ire</strong></p>
<p align="left"><img src="http://lrionline.com/ink/images/010609/McDonald's.jpg" alt="" hspace="3" width="171" height="114" align="left" />WalMart was the first large enterprise to be chastised publically by the press and unions for providing information to their management about the perils of the Employee Free Choice Act.  McDonalds recently joined the ranks of those <a href="http://www.findingdulcinea.com/news/politics/2008/December/Controversial-Employee-Free-Choice-Act-Rears-Head-in-McDonald-s-Row.html " target="_blank">excoriated</a> for doing the same thing – explaining to their franchisee owners the impact the passage of the EFCA could have on their operations.  As is typical of Big Labor, the result was to attempt to intimidate the fast food giant.</p>
<p>William Whitman, spokesman for McDonalds USA, <a href="http://www.openmediaboston.org/node/473" target="_blank">clarified</a> McDonald’s position:</p>
<p>&#8220;Regarding this legislation, as a restaurant organization with 3,100 independent small businesses, we have a responsibility to inform and educate our system about legislation that could impact their business. This was the intent of the communication in question. Unfortunately, the message was leaked to the media and excerpts were used to create the impression that McDonald&#8217;s is engaged in anti-union activities. Again, this was not our intent.”</p>
<p>**********</p>
<p><strong>Jack Welch Chimes In</strong></p>
<p>In an admonition to business owners to educate their employees about the Employee Free Choice Act, the <a href="http://www.livemint.com/2009/01/04221334/Four-resolutions-that-would-he.html " target="_blank">business icon stated</a>,</p>
<p>&#8220;union work rules are one of the main reasons that the auto industry is close to bankruptcy&#8230;In 2009, Americans couldn&#8217;t less afford a resurgent unionization movement.&#8221;</p>
<p>**********</p>
<p align="left"><strong>ULP Charge of the Month</strong></p>
<p align="left">Seems the ITPE Local 4873 in Tacoma doesn&#8217;t want it&#8217;s employees talking to their collective bargaining representatives!</p>
<p class="style3" align="left"><a href="http://lrionline.com/ink/images/010609/ULP_112108.pdf" target="_blank"><img src="http://lrionline.com/ink/images/010609/ULP_112108.jpg" alt="ULP charge" width="117" height="134" /></a></p>
<p>Download the ULP <a href="http://lrionline.com/ink/images/010609/ULP_112108.pdf" target="_blank">here.</a></p>
<p>**********</p>
<p><strong>Devious Strategy</strong></p>
<p><img src="http://lrionline.com/ink/images/010609/seiu.jpg" alt="" hspace="3" width="126" height="98" align="left" /></p>
<p>The SEIU has been accused of signing contracts that are not necessarily in the best interests of its members, and of playing cozy with management.  However, US businesses <a href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/archives/2008/12/17/seiu-again-accused-of-fixing-vote/ " target="_blank">may find a sting</a> in these “management-friendly” contracts.</p>
<p align="left">“Stern has every intention to paralyze the businesses he now has sway over by holding over the heads of management the sheer size of his membership as newer contracts come up for negotiation. These businesses are signing their own death warrants by imagining that the SEIU has any long term interest in working with management.”</p>
<p>**********</p>
<p><strong>Sticky Fingers!</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nlpc.org/view.asp?action=viewArticle&amp;aid=2818" target="_blank">Current charges or sentences</a> of embezzling union officials:</p>
<p>Van T. Barnes &#8211; IBT: $97,661</p>
<p>Fidel R. Garza &#8211; AFGE: $84,000</p>
<p>Thomas Brown &#8211; IBEW: $6,467</p>
<p>Diane Martin &#8211; IBT: $1,535</p>
<p>**********</p>
<p><strong>Labor Relations INK</strong> is published semi-weekly and<br />
is edited by Labor Relations Institute, Inc. Feel<br />
free to pass this newsletter on to anyone you<br />
think might enjoy it. New subscribers can sign up<br />
by visiting:</p>
<p><a href="http://lrionline.com/free-stuff/newsletter-signup" target="_blank">http://lrionline.com/free-stuff/newsletter-signup</a></p>
<p>If you use content from this newsletter please<br />
attribute it to Labor Relations Institute and<br />
include our website address: <a href="http://www.LRIonline.com" target="_blank">www.LRIonline.com</a></p>
<p>Contributing editors for this issue: Phillip Wilson, Greg Kittinger</p>
<p>Labor Relations Institute<br />
7850 South Elm Place &#8211; Suite E<br />
Broken Arrow, OK<br />
74011<br />
US</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lrionline.com/media/2009/01/06/january-6-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
